MATCHSTAT PRO

Every edge, every game, every day

New customer offer
One Sport
All Sports Promo
Tennis
$29.99/billed monthly
  • Unlimited daily predictions
  • Unlock best bets with edge
  • Access all tipster picks
  • Filter & segment data
  • Unlock all models
  • CANCEL ANYTIME
Subscribe

Prediction of Celine Naef [178th] vs Manon Leonard [188th] Head-to-Head At The

By Wojtek Kolan

Head-To-Head: Naef 3 - 0 Leonard

They have played 8 sets in total, with Naef winning 6 and Leonard winning 2. The last match between Naef and Leonard was at the W35 Reims, 04-10-2024, Quarterfinals, I.hard with Celine Naef getting the victory 6-3 3-6 6-3.

Players Head-To-Head Match Wins
Celine Naef 3
Manon Leonard 0
Naef vs Leonard H2H Profile
Naef Stats Leonard
57% (8-6) YTD Win/Loss 68% (23-11)
3 Head-to-Head 0
178 Ranking 188
121 Highest Rank 176
19 Age 24
- Plays -
7 Titles 5
65% (117-63) Career Total W/L 56% (180-140)
$220,512 Career Prize Money $1,915
0 YTD Titles 1
3 Indoor H2H 0

Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)

Naef VS Leonard H2H Matches played

Winning Player Losing Player Score
6-3 3-6 6-3
cross
Celine Naef
Player
Manon Leonard
53% ( 51 of 96)
1st Serve %
48% ( 43 of 89)
11
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
6
67% ( 34 of 51)
1st Serve Won
58% ( 25 of 43)
51% ( 23 of 45)
2nd Serve Won
50% ( 23 of 46)
45% ( 5 of 11)
Break Points Won
33% ( 4 of 12)
41% ( 39 of 96)
Rtn Points Won
46% ( 41 of 89)
98
Total Points Won
87
6-0 6-3
cross
Celine Naef
Player
Manon Leonard
63% ( 30 of 48)
1st Serve %
47% ( 16 of 34)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
77% ( 23 of 30)
1st Serve Won
38% ( 6 of 16)
50% ( 9 of 18)
2nd Serve Won
28% ( 5 of 18)
83% ( 5 of 6)
Break Points Won
50% ( 1 of 2)
33% ( 16 of 48)
Rtn Points Won
68% ( 23 of 34)
55
Total Points Won
27
6-2 6-7(3) 6-3
cross
Celine Naef
Player
Manon Leonard
65% ( 61 of 94)
1st Serve %
52% ( 50 of 97)
6
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
7
64% ( 39 of 61)
1st Serve Won
68% ( 34 of 50)
67% ( 22 of 33)
2nd Serve Won
45% ( 21 of 47)
45% ( 5 of 11)
Break Points Won
29% ( 2 of 7)
35% ( 33 of 94)
Rtn Points Won
43% ( 42 of 97)
103
Total Points Won
88

Naef VS Leonard H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

Naef Vs Leonard H2H Stats
Celine Naef Naef Stats Manon Leonard Leonard
3 H2H Matches 0
6 Sets Won 2
45 Games Won 27
18 Aces (Total) 4
1 Total Double Faults 17
1:49:20 Average Match Time 1:49:20
60% (142/238) 1st Serve % 50% (109/220)
68% (96/142) 1st Serve Win % 60% (65/109)
56% (54/96) 2nd Serve Win % 44% (49/111)
54% (15/28) Break Points Won % (Total) 33% (7/21)
48% (106/220) Return Points Win % 37% (88/238)
100% (3/3) Best of 3 Sets Win % 0% (0/3)
0% (0/0) Best of 5 Sets Win % 0% (0/0)
0% (0/1) Tiebreaks Win % (Total) 100% (1/1)
100% (2/2) Deciding Set Win % 0% (0/2)
100% (3/3) 1st Set Won, Won Match 0% (0/0)
0% (3/0) 1st Set Won, Lost Match 0% (0/0)
0% (0/0) 1st Set Lost, Won Match 0% (3/0)

Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.

Celine Naef vs Manon Leonard Important H2H Prediction Stats:

Head-to-head: Naef 3 - 0 Leonard

Editorial Prediction:

  • Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Naef has won 40.7% of points on their second serve, while Leonard has won 42.45%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
  • Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Naef, in recent form, has won 45.23% of their opponent's second serve points, while Leonard has won 48.69%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.26% and 30.07% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: Naef has saved 45.18% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Leonard has saved 47.44% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Over the last year Naef has won 57.89% of matches played (W/L 33/ 24), with Leonard winning 58.75% (W/L 47/ 33) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
  • Best surface: Naef has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 73% (W/L 70/ 26), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 6/ 6). Leonard has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 67% (W/L 93/ 46), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 31% (W/L 21/ 46).
  • Player level: In the last year, Naef has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 62.5% of matches (W/L 30/ 18), where as Leonard has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 62.16% of matches (W/L 46/ 28). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
  • Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Naef winning 3 times and Leonard being victorious 0 times. They have played 8 sets in total, with Naef winning 6 and Leonard winning 2. The last match between Naef and Leonard was at the W35 Reims, 04-10-2024, Quarterfinals, I.hard with Celine Naef getting the victory 6-3 3-6 6-3.
  • Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:49:20.
  • Deciding set H2H prediction: Naef and Leonard have played a deciding set 2 times, with Naef winning 2 times and Leonard 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
  • Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Naef winning 0, and Leonard 1.
  • Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Naef has played against opponents with an average rank of 215.6 while Leonard has played against players with an average rank of 341.13.
  • Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Naef has won 69% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Leonard has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
  • Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
  • Break point conversion: In recent form, Naef has converted 35.79% of breakpoint opportunities, and Leonard has converted 44.19% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
  • If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
  • Celine Naef Recent Matches Played

    OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
    Rubber 1
    cross
    Celine Naef
    Player
    Marta Kostyuk
    50% ( 47 of 94)
    1st Serve %
    132% ( 70 of 53)
    1
    Aces
    3
    4
    Double Faults
    6
    66% ( 31 of 47)
    1st Serve Won
    70% ( 32 of 46)
    53% ( 25 of 47)
    2nd Serve Won
    28% ( 8 of 29)
    50% ( 4 of 8)
    Break Points Won
    20% ( 3 of 15)
    40% ( 38 of 94)
    Rtn Points Won
    47% ( 35 of 75)
    91
    Total Points Won
    78
    W
    6-4 7-6(1) H2H
    R1
    cross
    Anna Bondar
    Player
    Celine Naef
    59% ( 47 of 79)
    1st Serve %
    51% ( 42 of 83)
    1
    Aces
    0
    1
    Double Faults
    6
    66% ( 31 of 47)
    1st Serve Won
    64% ( 27 of 42)
    66% ( 21 of 32)
    2nd Serve Won
    49% ( 20 of 41)
    57% ( 4 of 7)
    Break Points Won
    33% ( 2 of 6)
    34% ( 27 of 79)
    Rtn Points Won
    43% ( 36 of 83)
    88
    Total Points Won
    74
    L
    6-2 3-6 6-3 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Xinyu Gao
    Player
    Celine Naef
    81% ( 25 of 31)
    1st Serve %
    52% ( 23 of 44)
    1
    Aces
    2
    1
    Double Faults
    3
    76% ( 19 of 25)
    1st Serve Won
    48% ( 11 of 23)
    83% ( 5 of 6)
    2nd Serve Won
    24% ( 5 of 21)
    86% ( 6 of 7)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 0)
    23% ( 7 of 31)
    Rtn Points Won
    64% ( 28 of 44)
    52
    Total Points Won
    23
    L
    6-0 6-1 H2H
    SF
    cross
    Elena Pridankina
    Player
    Celine Naef
    64% ( 38 of 59)
    1st Serve %
    48% ( 28 of 58)
    3
    Aces
    3
    5
    Double Faults
    8
    68% ( 26 of 38)
    1st Serve Won
    61% ( 17 of 28)
    43% ( 9 of 21)
    2nd Serve Won
    37% ( 11 of 30)
    45% ( 5 of 11)
    Break Points Won
    50% ( 3 of 6)
    41% ( 24 of 59)
    Rtn Points Won
    52% ( 30 of 58)
    65
    Total Points Won
    52
    L
    6-4 6-3 H2H
    QF
    cross
    Celine Naef
    Player
    Ella Seidel
    57% ( 60 of 106)
    1st Serve %
    62% ( 53 of 86)
    12
    Aces
    6
    5
    Double Faults
    0
    72% ( 43 of 60)
    1st Serve Won
    70% ( 37 of 53)
    48% ( 22 of 46)
    2nd Serve Won
    48% ( 16 of 33)
    67% ( 4 of 6)
    Break Points Won
    38% ( 3 of 8)
    39% ( 41 of 106)
    Rtn Points Won
    38% ( 33 of 86)
    98
    Total Points Won
    94
    W
    6-3 4-6 6-4 H2H
    R2
    cross
    Celine Naef
    Player
    Alexandra Eala
    58% ( 54 of 93)
    1st Serve %
    64% ( 49 of 77)
    11
    Aces
    1
    3
    Double Faults
    2
    72% ( 39 of 54)
    1st Serve Won
    69% ( 34 of 49)
    54% ( 21 of 39)
    2nd Serve Won
    39% ( 11 of 28)
    44% ( 4 of 9)
    Break Points Won
    25% ( 2 of 8)
    35% ( 33 of 93)
    Rtn Points Won
    42% ( 32 of 77)
    92
    Total Points Won
    78
    W
    4-6 6-2 6-3 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Celine Naef
    Player
    Tamara Korpatsch
    63% ( 63 of 100)
    1st Serve %
    65% ( 58 of 89)
    7
    Aces
    3
    1
    Double Faults
    2
    68% ( 43 of 63)
    1st Serve Won
    66% ( 38 of 58)
    59% ( 22 of 37)
    2nd Serve Won
    48% ( 15 of 31)
    27% ( 3 of 11)
    Break Points Won
    17% ( 1 of 6)
    35% ( 35 of 100)
    Rtn Points Won
    40% ( 36 of 89)
    101
    Total Points Won
    88
    W
    4-6 6-3 6-2 H2H
    QF
    cross
    Destanee Aiava
    Player
    Celine Naef
    63% ( 29 of 46)
    1st Serve %
    74% ( 35 of 47)
    2
    Aces
    2
    1
    Double Faults
    4
    79% ( 23 of 29)
    1st Serve Won
    60% ( 21 of 35)
    65% ( 11 of 17)
    2nd Serve Won
    25% ( 3 of 12)
    100% ( 4 of 4)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 4)
    26% ( 12 of 46)
    Rtn Points Won
    49% ( 23 of 47)
    57
    Total Points Won
    36
    L
    6-4 6-0 H2H
    R2
    cross
    Celine Naef
    Player
    Linda Klimovicova
    65% ( 52 of 80)
    1st Serve %
    55% ( 38 of 69)
    6
    Aces
    5
    3
    Double Faults
    5
    63% ( 33 of 52)
    1st Serve Won
    55% ( 21 of 38)
    39% ( 11 of 28)
    2nd Serve Won
    45% ( 14 of 31)
    50% ( 5 of 10)
    Break Points Won
    30% ( 3 of 10)
    45% ( 36 of 80)
    Rtn Points Won
    49% ( 34 of 69)
    78
    Total Points Won
    71
    W
    6-4 6-4 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Celine Naef
    Player
    Lian Tran
    51% ( 20 of 39)
    1st Serve %
    63% ( 26 of 41)
    4
    Aces
    0
    4
    Double Faults
    2
    80% ( 16 of 20)
    1st Serve Won
    50% ( 13 of 26)
    68% ( 13 of 19)
    2nd Serve Won
    27% ( 4 of 15)
    83% ( 5 of 6)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 0)
    26% ( 10 of 39)
    Rtn Points Won
    59% ( 24 of 41)
    53
    Total Points Won
    27
    W
    6-2 6-0 H2H

    Manon Leonard Recent Matches Played

    OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
    QF
    cross
    Fiona Ferro
    Player
    Manon Leonard
    65% ( 32 of 49)
    1st Serve %
    73% ( 65 of 89)
    0
    Aces
    1
    0
    Double Faults
    1
    91% ( 29 of 32)
    1st Serve Won
    51% ( 33 of 65)
    47% ( 8 of 17)
    2nd Serve Won
    46% ( 11 of 24)
    38% ( 5 of 13)
    Break Points Won
    67% ( 2 of 3)
    24% ( 12 of 49)
    Rtn Points Won
    51% ( 45 of 89)
    82
    Total Points Won
    56
    L
    7-5 6-2 H2H
    Q1
    cross
    Manon Leonard
    Player
    Dalila Spiteri
    66% ( 45 of 68)
    1st Serve %
    62% ( 38 of 61)
    1
    Aces
    0
    3
    Double Faults
    1
    78% ( 35 of 45)
    1st Serve Won
    63% ( 24 of 38)
    52% ( 12 of 23)
    2nd Serve Won
    57% ( 13 of 23)
    100% ( 3 of 3)
    Break Points Won
    14% ( 1 of 7)
    31% ( 21 of 68)
    Rtn Points Won
    39% ( 24 of 61)
    71
    Total Points Won
    58
    W
    6-4 7-5 H2H
    R2
    cross
    Anna-Lena Friedsam
    Player
    Manon Leonard
    78% ( 51 of 65)
    1st Serve %
    50% ( 36 of 72)
    4
    Aces
    3
    2
    Double Faults
    1
    78% ( 40 of 51)
    1st Serve Won
    75% ( 27 of 36)
    71% ( 10 of 14)
    2nd Serve Won
    50% ( 18 of 36)
    50% ( 1 of 2)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 1)
    23% ( 15 of 65)
    Rtn Points Won
    38% ( 27 of 72)
    77
    Total Points Won
    60
    L
    6-3 7-6(4) H2H
    R1
    cross
    Manon Leonard
    Player
    Tereza Martincova
    57% ( 47 of 82)
    1st Serve %
    74% ( 68 of 92)
    3
    Aces
    4
    2
    Double Faults
    3
    66% ( 31 of 47)
    1st Serve Won
    53% ( 36 of 68)
    49% ( 17 of 35)
    2nd Serve Won
    38% ( 9 of 24)
    88% ( 7 of 8)
    Break Points Won
    57% ( 4 of 7)
    41% ( 34 of 82)
    Rtn Points Won
    51% ( 47 of 92)
    95
    Total Points Won
    79
    W
    4-6 6-3 6-1 H2H
    R2
    cross
    Tereza Valentova
    Player
    Manon Leonard
    65% ( 22 of 34)
    1st Serve %
    50% ( 23 of 46)
    3
    Aces
    2
    0
    Double Faults
    3
    73% ( 16 of 22)
    1st Serve Won
    48% ( 11 of 23)
    75% ( 9 of 12)
    2nd Serve Won
    26% ( 6 of 23)
    55% ( 6 of 11)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 2)
    26% ( 9 of 34)
    Rtn Points Won
    63% ( 29 of 46)
    54
    Total Points Won
    26
    L
    6-1 6-0 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Manon Leonard
    Player
    Lina Gjorcheska
    52% ( 51 of 99)
    1st Serve %
    67% ( 82 of 122)
    2
    Aces
    11
    3
    Double Faults
    5
    69% ( 35 of 51)
    1st Serve Won
    65% ( 53 of 82)
    42% ( 20 of 48)
    2nd Serve Won
    15% ( 6 of 40)
    45% ( 10 of 22)
    Break Points Won
    54% ( 7 of 13)
    44% ( 44 of 99)
    Rtn Points Won
    52% ( 63 of 122)
    118
    Total Points Won
    103
    W
    6-7(4) 7-5 6-2 H2H
    SF
    cross
    Linda Klimovicova
    Player
    Manon Leonard
    51% ( 49 of 96)
    1st Serve %
    51% ( 41 of 81)
    12
    Aces
    1
    7
    Double Faults
    5
    71% ( 35 of 49)
    1st Serve Won
    56% ( 23 of 41)
    49% ( 23 of 47)
    2nd Serve Won
    53% ( 21 of 40)
    71% ( 5 of 7)
    Break Points Won
    29% ( 2 of 7)
    40% ( 38 of 96)
    Rtn Points Won
    46% ( 37 of 81)
    95
    Total Points Won
    82
    L
    6-4 3-6 6-0 H2H
    QF
    cross
    Manon Leonard
    Player
    Tereza Valentova
    56% ( 64 of 114)
    1st Serve %
    63% ( 69 of 109)
    2
    Aces
    2
    10
    Double Faults
    7
    66% ( 42 of 64)
    1st Serve Won
    51% ( 35 of 69)
    38% ( 19 of 50)
    2nd Serve Won
    43% ( 17 of 40)
    60% ( 9 of 15)
    Break Points Won
    54% ( 7 of 13)
    46% ( 53 of 114)
    Rtn Points Won
    52% ( 57 of 109)
    118
    Total Points Won
    105
    W
    7-5 6-7(5) 6-4 H2H
    R2
    cross
    Manon Leonard
    Player
    Daria Snigur
    54% ( 25 of 46)
    1st Serve %
    75% ( 36 of 48)
    1
    Aces
    0
    1
    Double Faults
    2
    72% ( 18 of 25)
    1st Serve Won
    44% ( 16 of 36)
    43% ( 9 of 21)
    2nd Serve Won
    17% ( 2 of 12)
    60% ( 6 of 10)
    Break Points Won
    43% ( 3 of 7)
    41% ( 19 of 46)
    Rtn Points Won
    63% ( 30 of 48)
    57
    Total Points Won
    37
    W
    6-4 6-1 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Manon Leonard
    Player
    Justina Mikulskyte
    44% ( 47 of 107)
    1st Serve %
    55% ( 42 of 76)
    0
    Aces
    1
    8
    Double Faults
    8
    62% ( 29 of 47)
    1st Serve Won
    55% ( 23 of 42)
    47% ( 28 of 60)
    2nd Serve Won
    44% ( 15 of 34)
    50% ( 6 of 12)
    Break Points Won
    38% ( 6 of 16)
    47% ( 50 of 107)
    Rtn Points Won
    50% ( 38 of 76)
    95
    Total Points Won
    88
    W
    0-6 6-1 7-5 H2H
    banner

    Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

    Naef & Leonard Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
    Celine Naef Naef Stats Manon Leonard Leonard
    65% (117/63) Win/Loss 56% (180/140)
    62% (259/161) Sets Win/Loss 55% (401/326)
    55% (2117/1732) Games Win/Loss 51% (3377/3239)
    0.28 Aces Per Game 0.11
    521 Aces Total 358
    0.21 Double Faults Per Game 0.33
    388 Total Double Faults 1060
    1:35:50 Average Match Time 1:30:17
    302.94 Average Opponent Rank 422.2
    60% (7400/12291) 1st Serve % 59% (11311/19201)
    64% (4759/7400) 1st Serve Win % 60% (6824/11311)
    49% (2387/4891) 2nd Serve Win % 45% (3526/7890)
    50% (779/1556) Break Points Won % (Total) 51% (1260/2466)
    46% (5704/12338) Return Points Win % 47% (9092/19400)
    65% (117/180) Best of 3 Sets Win % 56% (177/317)
    0% (0/0) Best of 5 Sets Win % 0% (0/0)
    60% (21/35) Tiebreaks Win % (Total) 64% (43/67)
    58% (35/60) Deciding Set Win % 51% (46/90)
    87% (109/95) 1st Set Won, Won Match 90% (169/152)
    13% (109/14) 1st Set Won, Lost Match 10% (169/17)
    31% (71/22) 1st Set Lost, Won Match 19% (151/28)

    Other Predictions

    Porsche Tennis Grand Prix - Stuttgart

    flag
    20 Apr
    flag
    14:00
    Prediction

    Porsche Tennis Grand Prix - Stuttgart

    flag
    20 Apr
    flag
    15:30
    Prediction

    Open Capfinances Rouen Metropole - Rouen

    flag
    20 Apr
    flag
    16:30
    Prediction

    W35 Sharm ElSheikh

    flag
    flag
    Prediction

    W15 Kursumlijska Banja

    flag
    flag
    Prediction
    • Loading news...